Democratic candidates for governor next year have seized on a couple whopper issues, including public spending on for-profit charter schools and more funding for opioid treatment services and centers.

Former U.S. Rep. Betty Sutton has associated herself with tackling the on-going, decades-old embarrassment of Ohio spending billions upon billions on poor performing for-profit charter schools. Dayton Mayor Nan Whaley has chosen to tackle the opioid epidemic by suing early two dozen drug manufacturers.

Former state Rep. Connie Pillich has promised to campaign in all 88 Ohio counties and defy President Donald Trump should he want to deploy Ohio National Guardsmen for his own use, while state Sen. Joe Schiavoni focuses on leadership and workers rights.

So far, one of the biggest issues no candidate, Democrat or Republican, has vowed to take on involves the 1.75 million people who one way or another depend on Ohio’s safety net of retirement pensions.

According to one report from the Columbus Dispatch, “Collectively, Ohio’s five public pension funds have $192 billion in assets and last year paid out more than $15 billion in pension benefits and $1.1 billion in health-care benefits.”

While each fund has the full faith and credit of the state backing the payment of retirement benefits themselves, any provision of health insurance is strictly voluntary, depending on the financial health of each system to do so.

Due to poor economic performance, rising costs for health-care in general and prescription-drug in particular, and retirees living longer, some of Ohio’s give pension retirement funds are employing three strategies to course correct: Reducing or eliminating cost-of-living adjustments, cutting subsidies and increasing health-care premiums.

A study reported on by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University offers a dark future for the funds.

“’Ohio’s four largest public pension plans are severely underfunded based on traditional metrics of pension solvency, and they are only guaranteed to be able to finance their promised obligations for roughly the next decade without additional taxpayer contributions,’ Erick Elder and David Mitchell, both economists, wrote. The two economists further warned that “the funding ratio does not take into consideration the investment risk associated with pension-plan assets; even if Ohio’s pensions were fully funded today, they would still only have a fifty-fifty chance of being able to fulfill their promises in the year 2045.”

While most of Ohio’s Big Eight newspapers have only touched on the coming crisis in confidence in pension health, one commentator has taken it upon himself to be the voice of warning on how the funds have tumbled during the six years John Kasich has been governor.

Hedge fund managers, raking in record fees in the millions, have greedily taken their fees but haven’t delivered on the kind of historic returns each fund needs to keep up with its 30-year formula to guarantee safety.

The size of the pension system problem doesn’t diminish the importance of how for-profit charter schools and an opioid epidemic gone wild are debilitating the state. But the size and scope of the problem, since it affects almost two million residents, or almost 20 percent of the population, is waiting for a leader to become give voice to it. None of the Republican candidates for governor, announced or not, have spoken word one about it.

When Democrats review their economic message from last year, a message many said was weak at best in light of Donald Trumps ubiquitous, believe it if you want slogan of “Make America Great Again,” they might want to take it on as their issue.

It’s a winner issue for Republicans who held their nose and voted for Trump and moderate Democrats who switched from Hillary Clinton to vote for Trump.

If you’re not a millionaire, and what you’ve worked for all your life pans out to be less than you were promised, that seems to be an economic opportunity for Democrats to pitch themselves to the Trump-class voter. That’s as long as they don’t get snookered by the orange man from New York City who said he would produce good-paying jobs even though his budget plan paints an all-together different picture.

Getting shafted by their retirement system would indeed be a cruel reward for entering their sunset years. The issue of weak, not “rock solid” pension retirement plans needs a Democratic paladin to right the wrong.

If Ohio Democrats want to win any of the open statewide seats next year, especially the governor’s office, a tailor-made, vote-getting issue is waiting for one of them to breath political life into.

It’s an issue that has broad appeal, one that can move stubborn Republicans who don’t like to get fooled by anyone, especially members of their own party, to their cause.

Which Democratic candidate, announced or not, will take up the cause, shoulder the flag and march forward with it? The one that does just might hitch their wagon to an issue that’s a winner.

 
  • Red Rover

    Just how did you confirm that no unannounced Republican candidates have not made statements? Seems like an odd statement to make.

  • John McNay

    A couple of points. The Mercatus Center is a bunch of right-wing extremists and reasonable people should never listen to them. Secondly, the Kasich administration has for his entire term insisted that the state will not increase the employer’s portion of the pension. That is irresponsible. Thirdly, there are many problems connected with the expensive investment advisors employed by the pensions . They always lowball investment estimates and then make terrible investment choices to guarantee the funds won’t earn much money. Then the next year, they say, I told you so, and repeat the process. If they just took the money out of the hands of the investment “managers” and put the money into index funds, costs would sharply decline and performance would sharply increase.

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:


Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!