Brent Larkin, the semi-retired Plain Dealer editorial page chief who now writes a weekly column for the paper, may have caught a lot of his readers by surprise by linking the “N-word” to Gov. Kasich in his most recent Sunday piece.

No, it’s not what you think.

The “N” refers to “nauseating”, which is how Larkin bluntly described the governor’s evasive position on the gun issue in Ohio: Kasich’s feathery response showed something less than his boasted derring-do leadership to move the state forward.

In case you must be reminded, here is the governor’s empty rationale that Larkin recorded:

“As we move forward, whatever we do , we don’t want to erode the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens.”

Larkin then went on to recite the ugly statististics of the slaughter of young people in 2011 by killers wielding firearms.

Good for Brent! More so, because assigning “nauseous” to a Kasich dance step was a clear departure from how the paper has been glowing about the Guv’s bold initiatives for his Brave New Ohio ever since the Plain Dealer endorsed him for governor.

As a longtime fixture as a political writer in Cleveland, Larkin is accorded a certain degree of attention for his views. Although Kasich claims he doesn’t stoop to read newspapers, I can fairly guess that “nauseating” didn’t escape his notice. That’s why you surround yourself with aides.

Meantime, as critical issues rise, the paper has been seeing some of its staff disappear as it confronts worrisome cutbacks, the latest projected to slice 58 more from the newsroom. Its once-respected Columbus bureau has lost two of its three reporters. Reggie Fields has gone off to firmer ground with the Ohio State Medical Association, and Joe Guillen, to the Detroit Free Press. The paper’s book editor, Karen Long, is leaving to become the manager the Anisfield Books Awards program sponsored by the Cleveland Foundation. And Debbie VanTassel, a feature editor, is heading for the Arizona Republic with her husband Stu Warner, the paper’s former writing coach.

There was a day a couple decades ago when so many Beacon Journal reporters and editors (including me) were heading north to the PD that one could easily describe the BJ as the the PD’s farm club.

No such situation exists today, not ony for the PD but also the other dailies who are so stressed out by the electronic forces arrayed against them that they have hugged the middle of the road to avoid offending what’s left of their readers. Two most recent examples: The right-to-work issue in Michigan and demands for gun control were scarcely addressed by Ohio’s editorial writers. The only certainty was the daily compliments paid to the governor in hopes that the wish for a stronger economy would guarantee success.

By choice, the trend has gone from hard (and controversial) positions to feel-good stories selected to prove that the hometown paper really – really! – cared about the hometown readers.

Was I the only PD reader who was startled to see Kasich and the N-word in the same breath, courtesy of a widely read columnist for a paper with an ambivalent approach on some big issues? Let’s hope not.

  • pb_dirtgirl

    Does the Beacon Journal have a statehouse reporter these days, or is that a thing of the past?

  • anastasjoy

    The Beacon was gutted many years ago in pursuit of a much higher profit margin. Very sad. Unfortunately, I have few tears to shed for the Plain Dealer, as it has acted as an unquestioning mouthpiece for the corporate, business-favoring Greater Cleveland Partnership and ignored the viewpoints of the average citizens of its readership area. It also allows its right-wing columnist to engage in name-calling and unsupported arguments in a way it would never allow its middle-of-the-road columnists to do. (It has no liberal columnists). But mostly it seems out of touch with average people in northeast Ohio, other than to assume they are ALL sports-crazy. That’s far from true. Many care about other things.

  • No, you were not the only reader of the PD or a reader of Larkin who witnessed this more than adequate choice of words. As a long time reader who still loves to see the residue of reading the PD on my fingers, the decline of the PD’s impact is not beholden to the electronic media competition (although it cannot be disregarded). Rather it is the paper’s position to be out of touch with the majority of its readers. Granted this is my opinion, but I have noticed the loss of talent; the position/endorsements taken by the editorial board on elections/issues; and the overall decline in what was once a bastion of the 4th estate. No longer, and sadly, is the PD a key stone in the lives of many Clevelanders and Ohioans. I want a newspaper to challenge my views with facts and persuasive arguments, not cow-tow to the dollars necessary to keep it printing. Sadly that is the PD today and the staff you mentioned have sought to further their careers (rightfully so) but we the readers are the losers. Good article! Keep them coming!!

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!