One of the most hotly contested races in Ohio this fall is the battle between incumbent Mike Duffey and challenger Donna O’Connor for Ohio’s 21st House District, representing the northern suburbs of Franklin County.

In 2010, Republican Mike Duffey narrowly won after both sides spent nearly $1 million in the old district, which was much more favorable to Democrats.

This election cycle, with districts redrawn to include a wider Republican margin, Duffey thought he could coast to victory without much effort. On October 7, the Dispatch reported:

At the beginning of the week, state Rep. Mike Duffey was talking about enjoying a quieter race this year.

But that quiet has been shattered. Supporters of Duffey’s opponent took to the airwaves earlier in the month with an ad targeting his votes to cut public education:

The ad is funded by Moving Ohio Forward, a group backed by statewide education organizations. The Dispatch’s Jim Siegel reported today that MOF has spent a quarter of a million dollars in support of O’Connor.

So much for Duffey’s hopes to sleepwalk to victory.

At issue are Duffey’s votes on SB5 – a bill that tied teacher pay to high stakes test scores – and the state budget, which cut funding for education by $1.8 billion.

Sharing the November ballot with Duffey are school levies in Worthington and Dublin, both of which are directly linked to state budget cuts that Duffey voted for. Taxpayers in Worthington are facing the prospect of $446 more on an average home value of $211,000, all thanks to the elimination of $10 million in state funding supported by Duffey. If the levy fails, 40 more educators will be eliminated, resulting in larger class sizes and reduced course offerings.

The Dublin levy’s passage would mean $635 in new taxes on a typical $298K home. If it fails, the district will eliminate high school busing, athletics in the middle grades, reduce college prep courses like Advanced Placement and foreign languages, increase fees for activities to $400 each, fire more teachers and increase class sizes.

These are decisions Mike Duffey says he supports making at the local level. But if John Kasich and Mike Duffey had made different choices at the state level, they wouldn’t have been necessary.

Tagged with:
 
  • DublinIrishBob

    The contradiction of supporting a Dublin or Worthington school levy AND Mike Duffey is crazy. I have talked to several Dublin residents about this and they fail to see the connection. Their support for Dufey has meant higher taxes for their own schools.

  • DMoore

    But won’t giving tens of millions of dollars to status quo companies like American Greetings, Diebold and Bob Evans, instead of to the schools, make are kids smarter? Our governor seems to think so.

  • John W.

    Let’s not forget that SB5 and Issue 2, which Duffey supported, attacked other members of the “hard working class,” including cops, firemen, and nurses, along with teachers.

  • pb_dirtgirl

    Good point. There’s a reason Donna O’Connor — and not Mike Duffey — received the endorsement of the FOP.

  • DublinIrishBob

    Diebold has decided NOT to build their new headquarters that Kasich gave them money for.

  • Note to Donna O’Connor – nobody but the base reads Plunderbund. It is too over the top to diffuse into the general media. Putting attack posts in Plunderbund is not a media strategy, it is a waste of time. It makes you feel like you are doing something – but effective? Not so much.

  • You are commenting to the base. To win an election, you have to reach out BEYOND the base. Plunderbund is where campaigns go to die.

  • Actually, it is logically consistant. If you fund schools through the state, as O’Connor proposed, then each $1 of income tax would return about $0.18 to Dublin Schools. If instead, you tax properties, 100% goes to the schools. Local taxes for local services is a self-consistant, logical philosophy. Jacking the income tax on Dublin workers to pay for Portsmouth schools? Not so much.

  • Actually, Ohio has a two year budget. Strickland was able to balance the budget in 2008 by using billions in stimulus funds. Obama failed to provide those same billions in 2010, so the State had to cut its budget. That is where the $2 billion in education cuts came from. Nobody voted to have that stimulus withheld (except Obama). The legislature did have to vote to balance the budget without it.

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:


Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!