Online or “Cyber” charter schools have been in the national news recently as Pennsylvania’s largest online charter school offices have been raided by the FBI, IRS & U.S. Department of Education, and a second cyber-school from Philadelphia has surrendered it’s charter after the state filed a lawsuit against it “citing an astonishingly long list of academic and financial problems.”  Renowned education researcher Diane Ravitch even gave Ohio a shoutout for our own horrendous cyber charters. (Thanks, Diane!)

And because she mentioned our favorite ineffective cyber-charter, the Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow (ECOT), and because we hadn’t mentioned them recently and didn’t want you to forget about them, we thought we’d do a quick rundown of some statistics about ECOT.

This post also helps tie in another recent development — the Columbus Dispatch’s crack research team digging into questionable data to spark an investigation by the Ohio Department of Education.  Remember, however, that the district had already contacted the Auditor to request assistance in researching possible irregularities & the Dispatch merely published the story as their latest “gotcha” moment against public education (e.g., Senate Bill 5, Issue 2, school levy, school funding, etc.).  In short, we believe you’ll find this data to be, well, let’s just say it’s questionable at best.

The Dispatch focused on attendance and made allegations about its potential effect on funding, we offer you similar numbers about student enrollment, followed by some graduation numbers (more explained below).

First, the monthly enrollment numbers listed on the 2010-2011 school funding reports.

Monthly Student Enrollment for 2010-2011, as reported to by ECOT to ODE for funding

  • Jul: 9,210.24
  • Aug: 9,207.87
  • Sep: 9,207.87
  • Oct: 8,933.21
  • Nov: 9,066.97
  • Dec: 9,468.75
  • Jan: 9,777.32
  • Feb: 9,914.37
  • Mar: 9,971.06
  • Apr: 10,205.22
  • May: 10,385.36
  • Jun: 10,403.61

Notice the consistent increase in the number of students throughout the course of the year (this includes all grades, K-12).  Next, note the final enrollment totals reported by ODE followed by the number of student withdrawals, including dropouts.

Total Student Enrollment (Final)

  • 2009-10: 9,255
  • 2010-11: 10,453

Total Student Withdrawals (including dropouts)

  • 2009-10: 8,354
  • 2010-11: 9,873

Let’s stop for a second and look at those numbers again.  Above, we looked at the monthly enrollment numbers steadily climb toward the final enrollment number of 10,453 with no hiccups in the data.  And now we see that the reported number of students who left the school is 9,873.  For you non-math folks (don’t get insulted, we’re doing this to help you and we know that the math folks don’t even read these paragraphs and only scan the numbers), that calculates to 94.5% of the total enrollment.  That seems like quite a strange combination of numbers in our way of thinking in the “normal” world.

Now some numbers about graduation.  The Ohio Department of Education publishes graduation rates one year late (there are reasons which we’re not going into here), so the most recent graduation data we have is for the 2009-2010 school year.

Number of 12th Graders

  • 2008-09: 1,212
  • 2009-10: 1,452

Number of 12th Grade Withdrawals (including dropouts)

  • 2008-09: 1,530
  • 2009-10: 1,907

As we saw above, the number of withdrawals seems out of line with the number of students enrolled. In this case, 455 more students withdrew than were actually enrolled.  Did the entire class withdraw or did 2,000 12th grade students enroll and withdraw throughout the year?  Do you find this to be worthy of investigation yet?

Number of Graduates for ECOT

  • 2008-2009: 1,231
  • 2009-2010: 1,546

Reported Graduation rate for ECOT

  • 2008-2009: 35.0%
  • 2009-2010: 40.7%

Okay, so by way of a summary of these last four numbers, in 2009-2010, ECOT had:

  • 1,452 12th grade students
  • 1,546 graduates
  • 40.7% graduation rate

Non-math folks again (we’re not going with ballpark estimates today): 1,546 graduates with a rate of 40.7% calculates to a total pool of 3,799 students.  By comparison, the last three classes of 12th grade students totals 3,656.  That lower-than-any-school-district-in-Ohio graduation rate also means ECOT had a total of 2,253 students that the school failed to guide to a diploma.

For another comparison, a rate of 40.7% means that approximately 591 students from the current year graduated while 861 were left behind.  And that is the highest graduation rate the ECOT has experienced in its history, meaning that every year a majority of students are NOT graduating from the school.  In the past three years alone, it equates to 2,311 of the 3,656 12th grade students failing to graduate from ECOT.  Of course, since the school reports that 4,633 12th grade students have withdrawn during that same 3-year stretch, we do have some questions.

Finally, a number that brings some of this data together in that it is equally appalling.  The state just began reporting the graduation rate for students who have been enrolled in a school for four consecutive years.  This is intended to provide a better indication of the long-term effect that the school is having on students.

Graduation data for students enrolled at ECOT for at least four years as of 2009-2010

  • Graduates: 1,070
  • Non-Graduates: 2,543
  • Graduation Rate: 29.6%

Yes, those numbers are on the correct lines.  There are a couple possible answers that we can get from these final numbers.  First, remember the question above about 12th grade enrollment and withdrawals relative to the graduation count?  Well, this leads us to believe that at least 1,070 of the students were consistently enrolled for the entire 09-10 school year, leaving the final 300 spots to account for the 1,900 withdrawals.

Second, we learn that students who attend ECOT for a long time graduate at a much lower rate than those that transfer in later in their high school career.  Those 1,070 graduated at a 29.6% rate while the overall rate including transfer students is 40.7%, implying that HS students might actually do worse the longer they are enrolled in ECOT.

If you can believe the numbers, that is.

Dispatch?  State Auditor? Ohio Department of Education?  The ball’s in your court.

  • stepshep

    Former temporary ECOT student here: The whole thing is a scam. Horrible, horrible, horrible.

  • gregmild

    I’m sorry to hear that you learned that the hard way.

  • anastasjoy

    Huh? I’m confused.

  • gregmild

    What?!? These are all numbers straight from the Ohio Department of Education — how could anyone be confused?

  • Who would have thunk it? Now where is that guy who thinks he is superman?

  • ECOT Parent

    I have not studied the numbers so I cannot comment as to whether this is right or wrong. I can however as a parent of an ECOT grad comment on my experience with ECOT. For an elementary school student, it was not a good fit for us. Needs a stay at home parent, willing to be very involved in every aspect of the students learning. For my high schooler, it was awesome. Both Carlie and I had more interaction with her teachers than we ever did at regular school. Teachers were genuinely concerned about her and her performance. I am very proud of my daughter and her accomplishments. Is ECOT right for everyone, no it is not. It is only right for Kids that want to learn and that have the inititive to sign on the computer every day and actually do their work. It is for self starters with goals and ambitions. It is not for the lazy kid that simply doesn’t want to go to school. There are a lot of negative infulences in our schools today, both public and private. I am thankful that I was able to sheild my daughter from some of those things.

  • Retrofuturistic

    Not only that, but Governor Kasich proselytized to students at ECOT’s graduation. At an institution that receives tax money from citizens of diverse or no religions:

  • EduBrat

    First, I said it once and have to say it again….numbers from ODE are not accurate and should be taken with a grain of salt. For God sake they have students entering kindergarten that have not yet been born! I would really be cautious about quoting any ODE numbers or data stats. Which leads me to the initial concern of what the heck is going on at ODE? What I do know is that you have a very poorly run information technology office. No leadership, no direction and absolutely no sense of why they exist. As a current employee I can tell you that this place runs anyone with any ethical fortitude out the door! I have seen some brilliant people leave in the last 6 months because they tried to do the right things and were treated very poorly for doing so. This place has an heir of ignorant people in positions that require ethics and law abiding capability, but instead certain roles are filled with incompetent, protect your party friends and take the easy way instead of the right way. I am certain after years of working here that no one would even know it if ODE fell off the face of the earth. They only suck up your hard earned money by buying toys for board members, driving state cars for personal use and other frivolous purchases. Not to mention they cant even run an office without allowing a whole lot of unethical things to occur without any oversight or accountability (but I will hold off on that for now until major media releases that information with photos and documentation)…Enough said for now…..

  • stepshep

    Me too, but thanks. I needed to recupe from a spinal fusion and at the time the academics fit for what I needed (chronic pain+huge doses of narcotics mess with your thinking cap), but every class was an easy A. Too easy. I wasn’t shocked when they sent my OGT report (I had a teacher crying on the phone about how good my scores were…and they weren’t that great) and showed that the school average for each subject was below the retake level! On average those kids had to retake what most schools see as a very low bar, stay awake to pass, exam. I mean I get that many of the other students were having issues…you don’t just decide to go to an online school something generally pushed these kids there. But that should not be allowed to happen. We need to have some sort of standard that says: “If on average your students are failing, someone will step in and fix it.” Sorry for the rant, I’m sure you guys know these things. I still get mad when I think about an entire year of my life that was essentially wasted.
    Either way it made great fodder for my college admissions essays!

  • gregmild

    And thus the reason I put out their official numbers every chance I get. I gather you would advocate the Ohio Auditor investigate ODE before turning their attention to ECOT?

  • buckeye15

    That would be your loveable inspector general Randy Meyer, appointed by Kasich. Good luck with that.

  • of course you’re with edubrat considering you’re most likely the same person! 😉

  • Amish Granny

    I have a document I can show you a science teacher at Electronic Classrooms of tomorrow had given her classroom step by step instructions on how to cheat. If you follow them, you ACE every time. I think they are also fudging grades to make themselves look better. I will freely share this information with anyone!!

  • Amish Granny

    The Teacher Called it Secrets to passing science – Students read a Honesty and Integrity paper- I think this teacher needs to re-read Electronic Classrooms of Tomorrow own policy!

  • coffeecup

    Because as my Dad told me long ago, “Figures lie, and liars figure!” Lots of students come to Ecot because their home schools are more than happy to get rid of them. It helps them maintain their “excellent”rating when they get rid of their poor performing students. They just dont want to give up the funds, but they dont mind at all giving up the student

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!