The Ohio Department of Education (ODE) has come out with some strong words for one of Ohio’s charter school management organizations that has the audacity to turn a profit — a practice that has existed since the for-profit charter school process was enacted in Ohio many years ago.

The management company believes it is entitled to redirect the $700,000 profit into the company’s other operations, in the same way that other for-profit companies such as White Hat Management and Altair Learning Management (ECOT) have been doing without state intervention.

But ODE disagrees:

That money is supposed to benefit the at-risk kids at [the charter], an online high school… Since 2010, the Ohio Department of Education repeatedly has told [the management company] to stop taking the money and to start letting the online high school make its own decisions.

Now, the state is trying to decide how to make sure the charter-school students receive the money meant to fund their education.

“We’re going to keep pushing this until, hopefully, we get a resolution,” said Joni Hoffman, director of the state’s office of community schools.

[Columbus Dispatch, 1/15/2012]

This is a rather confusing situation, of course.  I was unaware that charter school management companies weren’t supposed to be turning a profit.  In fact, I thought that premise has been a key facet of the argument against charter schools since their inception — they are redirecting public money to private entities.  That’s not much of a secret, is it?

During the recent coverage of a lawsuit by some charter schools against White Hat Management in an effort to get the company to open its financial records, a letter by White Hat CEO David Brennan was released to the public.  In the letter, Brennan makes it clear that he is trying to run a profitable business and, upon releasing the figures, they must honestly reveal their profits.

Clearly we have a problem in that we have not met a forecast for the bank in the last 5 years. PNC does not trust our numbers because of this failure. We must increase our enrollments and show profitability.  To meet the required payments on our loan, we must show an excess of 2 million every year for the next 5, while still covering our on-going necessary capital and operating needs.

Much as we would rather not, we need to sound a cautionary note. When both financial and test result stresses are high, there may be a temptation to ‘fudge the numbers.’ This must not happen. It would be contrary to everything we are fighting for. It would give credence to all the lies that our opponents tell about us.

In the first paragraph, Brennan implies that the profits for White Hat are on the decline and that the profits must be at least 2 million per year in the 5-year forecast.  But is ODE troubled by this blatant admission of profits? If so, they are keeping it a secret.  The only involvement by ODE is to support the jurisdiction of Franklin County Common Pleas Court Judge John Bender in the charter schools’ lawsuit against White Hat, but nothing about the profit.

David Brennan is also a fan of the legislature, gaining access this year to rewrite much of Ohio’s charter school rules through the state budget — hardly an indication that anyone is troubled by the profitability of this company by revenue from taxpayer dollars.  I suppose the fact that David Brennan and his immediate family members gave $431,721 to Ohio Republican politicians in the last election cycle doesn’t hurt, either.

But back to the management company that is incurring the wrath of ODE.  They haven’t been tithing to the GOP, so they’re being punished.  The worst part of the whole situation is that they have had the gall to direct the profits toward the education of other public school students!!

That’s right the London City School District is the target of ODE.  London is the sponsor/management agency for the London Digital Academy, an online high school.  According to London, the profit is theirs to disperse as they see fit.

The treasurer for both the charter school and the district, Kristine Blind, said officials plan to continue the “revenue sharing” method. The London district’s lawyer, Susan B. Greenberger, said it’s really not that unusual. The school was started by the district and by definition must be overseen by it.

The best part about the Dispatch article is the litany of quotes that document the indignation (and hypocrisy) of those mad that the public school district is profiting:

Now, the state is trying to decide how to make sure the charter-school students receive the money meant to fund their education.

Right, as opposed to the private companies running charters that are specifically called “for-profit.”  Perhaps if London City wasn’t trying to reinvest the money in the education of their children…

In one of its letters to the district, state officials said London “seems to be operating as though the community school exists solely to increase revenues to the district.”

Replace “district” with for-profit management company and there is no investigation by ODE, no newspaper story.

Some former members of the charter school’s governing board and a former London Academy principal say the charter-school students are being cheated.  “It’s a very sad situation. The bottom line is, kids aren’t getting served,” said Pete Bartkowiak, whose job as Academy principal was eliminated in December 2010.

This one is shocking.  Ohio charter school students being cheated – not getting served?  Who knew?  If only we had a state ranking system that would provide us some measures that would expose poor-performing charters schools.  Damn – if only!!!

Because London Academy is an online school, it has lower costs than a brick-and-mortar school might. That’s why it makes a profit.

Time out.  Read that sentence back slowly.  Online schools have lower costs and that’s why they make a profit.  So, the school has lower costs, resulting in a profit, but ODE is claiming that London should be spending all of the revenue on the school.  Right.  So if online schools have lower costs, resulting in a profit, why is Ohio continuing to fund more and more online schools every year, including 2 that rank in the top 20 districts in the state?  It couldn’t have anything to do with Kasich’s good pal William Lager’s ECOT being the largest, could it?

The Education Department might have left the situation alone if London Academy was a high-performing school, Hoffman said. But it has an F grade. Officials wonder if the school would have improved if more money was going directly to it.

Do you think ODE officials also wonder:

  • if ECOT’s graduation rate would be higher than 41% if CEO William Lager cut back on business profits?
  • if White Hat management schools would have a higher average graduation rate than 12% if he wasn’t focused on earning $2 million in annual profits?
  • if the other 70 charter schools assigned “F” grades by ODE would have improved if they weren’t operated by for-profit companies?
  • if Ohio’s PUBLIC schools would improve if more was going directly to them?

This episode still has me shaking my head.  We have hundreds of charter schools in Ohio being operated by private companies receiving revenue from the state with the clearly stated intent of turning a profit for the owners.  And yet, as this article clearly indicates, the Ohio Department of Education is arguing that the London City School district should not be afforded the same option, despite the fact that they are taking the “profit” and reinvesting it into the public education system.

Maybe if the London superintendent and treasurer were donating some of the profits to our elected officials this would be a non-story.


Seriously – Officials wonder if the school would have improved if more money was going directly to it.


  • OK it’s time for the choir to start singing AMEN!!!!!!!!

  • So these people really think we’re that dumb?

  • Becca

    As long as schools are teaching the same kids in the same manner, why are you expecting different results?

  • Anastasjoy

    ALL of the so-called “profit” should be reinvested in education. At a time when we’re being told “there’s no money” for basic services, there is DEFINITELY no money for anyone to make a profit.

  • or return money from profits back to the state education system

  • Green Iris

    do you have any sort of data about how many school systems are starting a charter sch0ol? 
    What is the rational behind it?

  • It might be time for something that used to be used a long time ago— investigative reporting.  People should go and investigate these operations (aka schools) and see what our tax dollars are getting us.  Anyone know some people who’d pose as prospective parents interested in enrolling their son/daughter? 

  • Jwizzler

    This for-profit education stuff is disgusting. Charter schools take advantage of poor folks, online colleges take advantage of veterans, and the country loses. 

  • Jwizzler

    This for-profit education stuff is disgusting. Charter schools take advantage of poor folks, online colleges take advantage of veterans, and the country loses. 

  • clambake

    Just another example of government policies that  redistribute wealth upward.

  • Jwizzler

    The point is that if management companies like White Hat and Altair can keep the money from those kids, why can’t a school district? Why is the state cracking down on a public school, but not the private companies that make all the money? 

  • RickJamesbich

    First, ODE has no business cracking down on anyone for anything. Instead, I would like for someone to look very closely at ODE and their wasteful spending and disregard for doing what is ethical. They have several issues that need to be looked at from what I have heard and been given proof of from many unrelated sources:

    Disregard for the law
    Disregard for kids
    Absence of leadership
    Misrepresentation of data
    Mismanagement of vendors & contractors
    Lack of focus
    Under qualified people in high level positions
    Zero accountability
    15 years behind in business practices, communication, technology and outreach

    Now, do not get me wrong, there are many people who very much care at ODE. But, when cover ups and unethical values in an inbred place are acceptable you can expect the above to take place. I would wager that several things will surface this year about this agency’s practices and behaviors that will shed some painful truth to the tax payers of Ohio.

  • Thank you for making this site very interesting! Keep going! You’re doing very well!

  • Anonymous

    See Jwizzler comment, Dem.

    Oh, and where can I pick up my prize?

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!