I noticed this item in today’s Columbus Dispatch article reflecting on Kasich’s first year in office listing his accomplishments:

  • Ohio added 45,200 jobs.

Last year, the administration of Democratic predecessor Ted Strickland produced commitments for about 14,900 jobs through the state’s job-creation tax-credit program, and Ohio added about 25,000 jobs overall.

Kasich’s spokesmen contrast Ohio’s job growth last year with the net loss of more than 400,000 jobs during Strickland’s tenure — which fell during a devastating national recession.

Now, let me begin by saying that the data itself is accurate.  Using the U.S. Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics seasonally adjusted figures in their CES survey (survey of employers as opposed to households), you do get those numbers.

But there’s context to those numbers that makes it darn near impossible for John Kasich to take credit for them.  You see, you actually have to look at when those jobs were created:


You see, Ohio’s fiscal year runs from July 1 to June 30 of the following year.  So until June 30, 2011, Ohio was still under Governor Ted Strickland’s last budget even though Kasich was Governor.  

In pushing the legislature to pass it, Kasich said his “Jobs Budget” was the reform-oriented group of policy proposals that would lead to  job creation in Ohio.  No other piece of legislation has Kasich claimed would do more good for the economy than his “Jobs Budget.”  It’s where JobsOhio got its funding source, it’s where the State repealed the estate tax (although not effective until June 30, 2013… because otherwise the legislature would have had to find a way to pay for it.)  It’s is the alpha and omega, so far, of all of Kasich’s economic policies.

Most of the 46,600 jobs that Kasich touts as having been created in Ohio since he took office were created before his “Jobs Budget” was in force.  In fact, more than 82% of the jobs that were created since Kasich took office were created before July of this year (when Ohio was still under Governor Strickland’s budget.)  In fact, over half of the new jobs created during Kasich’s entire term so far were created within the first 90 days of the Administration. 

What did Kasich due during that time that warrants him receiving credit for those jobs?  Nothing.  (Note to any Kasich supporters: I challenge you to explain what Kasich did that makes him personally responsible for jobs created before he even had a State budget of his own. )

In the five months since the “Jobs Budget” became law and was in effect, Ohio has only created 8,000 new jobs (virtually all of which were created in November alone.)  In other words, even in using the same set of data Kasich regularly uses to claim that Ohio’s created over 40,000 jobs this year, it’s clear Kasich deserves none of the credit as they were created so early in his term.

38,600 jobs were created before Kasich’s “Jobs Budget"; Only 8,000 have been created since then.

And we’re talking about roughly equal time spans.  That means Ohio will need to create 30,600 jobs in December if the Jobs Budget wants to match Ohio’s job creation rate it had the six months prior to it becoming law.  Think that’s gonna happen?  Me either.  So, again, how does this data support the notion that Kasich has turned Ohio around?  I don’t know that, either.

Ohio’s unemployment rate dropped .5% in the six months prior to the “Jobs Budget.”  Even after you factor in the November jobs report, Ohio’s rate as only dropped .3% since then (and that’s only because the rate went up in June, which was the beginning of a three-month streak of rising unemployment rates as the “Jobs Budget” became law.)  Compared to the low points in April and May, and the rate has only dropped .1% below the bottom rate of the six months prior.  Regardless, by any measure, the drop in Ohio’s unemployment rate has slowed since Kasich’s “Jobs Budget” went into effect.

According to the U.S. Department of Labor’s household survey (LAUS), the number of individuals reporting they were employed went up by over 19,000 in the six months BEFORE the “Jobs Budget."  It’s actually DROPPED by over 28,000 since the Jobs Budget was enacted.  (In other words, there’s a disparity between the surveys.  The survey of employers shows Ohio has gained jobs.  The one of households shows overall, Ohio has fewer people employed since Kasich took office.  Both do show that things in Ohio was doing better BEFORE the “Jobs Budget” went into effect than after, however.)

And as for the labor population (the measure of how many individuals are working or looking for work), the labor market shrank in the six months before the Jobs Budget became law by 15,000.  Given that it shrank by 22,000 in November alone, do you really want to know the number of how much its shrunk in the five months since the Jobs Budget became law?

Over 48,000 Ohioans have dropped out of the labor market since the “Jobs Budget” became law.

To put it another way, more Ohioans have dropped out of labor market in Ohio in the five months since the “Jobs Budget” became law than all the jobs Ohio has created since January of this year.

In short, it’s hard to look at the totality of the objective economic data in Ohio and say that John Kasich deserves any credit.  Quite the opposite, it’s easier to suggest a negative correlation, and that John Kasich’s agenda has actually hurt job creation, rather than helped it.

  • Xx

    Imagine how man jobs Ted Stickland would have created had we kept him in office and kept the rail program in place.

  • Dmoore2222

    Governors do not create jobs. They all like to say that when campaigning, but the truth is Kasich has no more ability to create jobs than Elmo. Can a governor help nurture a job creation environment? Maybe. Thus far it’s just come down to bribing companies to locate or remain here with taxpayer money with no real assurance of any real economic benefit (see today’s Dispatch Business section article States’
    incentives carry few strings that supports this).

    What we’re missing are breakthrough industries that will distinguish Ohio and the rest of the nation from all those other countries that now can produce what we, and a small number of other nations, used to exclusively produce. We can no longer compete in that arena and still have sustainable wages and benefits for Ohio workers.  It’s a structural problem that won’t be fixed by campaign sloganism or phony employment numbers. So Ohio will continue to get picked over by the connected few who will pillage its resouces through fracking, lake water extraction,  privatization of state assets, etc.

  • Adrienne

    What breakthrough industries? The only thing that Americans know how to do is rob people and wreck, rob and pillage by means of contracts and or war.

  • Dmoore2222

    Sad but true, Adrienne.  I still think we can think and act our way out of this but we have to be honest about it. Politicians are the least able to do this because they thrive on crisis and use it to manipulate everyone.  If you could imagine a solar panel on every rooftop in America then you would see a breakthrough industry. It would employ developers, assemblers, salesmen, installers inspectors and customer service reps for good wages on a huge scale. Instead our political leaders here in Ohio are promoting fracking which is the opposite direction we should be headed, and will only enrich very few while prolonging our dependence on fossil fuels. Imagine if we would have spent a fraction of the 4 trillion on this rather than on useless wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

  • Demydo

    As a matter of fact, Kasich turned his back on workers by giving Ohio’s federal railway money to Florida.  He needs to take a look at how well GoBus is doing which proves the need for mass transportation in Ohio.  Jobs and need?   He doesn’t have both oars in the water. 

  • Fotogirlcb2002

    your last sentence says it all –How can you create jobs when you are selling  off some of the very places people are working. After they get sold and are privatized the employees are laid off. This is unemployment creation, isnt it.
    It makes me so ticked off  when I hear of him and his people paying companies to stay here — big tax breaks with my tax money I worked for that hes now just giving away.  

  • Great post, I enjoyed ready
    reading it

  • Ricky Shambles

    One of the other issues not often discussed is that Kasich is getting the state “back into shape” by stripping local cities and municipalities of funding which is actively working to further ruin schools and kill towns; no one’s going to approve ANOTHER levy when they just passed one. They don’t understand or care. (please pay no attention to the Ohio Supreme Court’s ruling that property taxes for school funding is totally unconstitutional, delivered about 20 years ago)

    So Kasich’s budget is kind of a Botox Budget. The face (state) might look pretty good, but every internal organ (cities) is failing. I suppose he somehow does not understand that the body will go without internal support.

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!