With reports coming out that the House version of SB 5 does nothing to fix the parts of the bill that opponents dislike, and in fact adds some clearly political restrictions on how unions can collect money that could potentially make it even less popular among Senate members, one might wonder what they’re thinking. Modern, in his piece linked to above, offers the opinion that eliminating voluntary payroll deductions for union PACs is a “nuclear” issue, and that the referendum vote will be easier for SB 5 opponents with this version than with the last version.

I disagree.

In October of 2010, The National Right To Work Legal Defense Foundation commissioned infamous Republican pollster/messaging expert Frank Luntz to poll union members on a variety of issues regarding the November election, government policies, unions, and union activities. Many of the results won’t surprise you: On every single policy issued polled, from fair labor laws to the economy to immigration, union members trusted and favored Democrats over Republicans. When asked if being in a union had helped or hurt their careers, “helped” beat “hurt” 3 to 1. But…

When asked if it was reasonable that “union leaders across America can spend your union dues on politics without getting your approval?” the sample overwhelmingly (66% to 14%) said “unreasonable” compared to “reasonable.”

There are two parts to that question, and Luntz is trying to assess the effects of doubling up. You see, he finds that overall, union members have a negative view of union leaders (perhaps not their own leaders, but “union leaders” in general), and he tests lots of different ways of tapping into that attitude. He also finds that the majority of union members disapprove of union dues being used to impact elections. Once again, the degree of disapproval depends on the way that the question is worded, but it is especially strong when the lead-in mentions a figure that includes both PAC spending and general treasury spending, but the actual question asks about approval of spending dues on elections.

And finally, in a result I actually find pretty stunning, the report shows that 80% of union workers agreed with the following statement, while 14% disagreed:

“Workers should have the right to decide whether to join a union. They should never be forced or coerced to join or pay dues to a union as a condition of employment.”

So, to recap: Both union members and the public at large support the right to collectively bargain for salaries. Union members agree that being in the union has been good for their careers and salaries. Union members believe that Democrats are much better than the Republicans on the issues, including labor issues. This is part of why SB 5 has been such a disaster for the GOP so far. The other part has been that they have utterly failed in convincing the public that this bill is about the budget and not really about breaking labor. So how do they win a referendum? By pretending the bill has nothing to do with collective bargaining or limiting the power of unions, AND abandoning the budget argument for one that they think will be a political winner:

A vote to repeal SB 5 is a vote to give labor bosses more money to try to buy elections, and forcing people not even in the union to fork over money to the union leaders. In fact, Big Labor has already spent X millions of dollars trying to buy this election. Don’t let the fat-cat union officials continue to waste the money of hard-working union members on politics when they should be working with governments to create more jobs.

It doesn’t really matter if you believe these poll results, because they do. And they are going to pretend that the bill was always about these things that they added at the last minute so that they could campaign on them, and pretend that it’s not about destroying the wages and benefits of the middle class. They’re going to tell people that union bosses treat union members unfairly, and try to distract them from the fact that letting local officials decide if the contract they offered is more reasonable than the one employees asked for is, in the words of Republican Bill Seitz, “the most incomprehensible and unfair thing I have ever heard of.”

The attack is predictable, will be well-funded, and Luntz has a successful track record of getting people to oppose things they previously supported by framing them in a light more favorable to the GOP. Will they convince voters that a vote for SB 5 is actually (do not finish reading this sentence if you have a weak stomach)…
a vote for “fairness?”

Well, they might have a bigger problem than they anticipate. The GOP has spent lots of time and lots of effort chipping away at Democratic support among rank-and-file union members. 20-25% of union members said in October that there was no real difference between the major parties on each of the issues polled, including labor issues, and another 15-25% “leaned” Republican. These people are extremely likely to be among those who said that their unions really shouldn’t be spending money on getting Dems elected. As of this month, I think you’d be hard-pressed in Ohio to find a union member who thinks there’s no difference between Democrats and Republicans when it comes to fair labor laws. We’ve heard many, many union members say that they voted for Republicans, and would never have believed that they would do the things they’ve done to hurt their professions. And there’s one group of people in the poll who are less popular than union officials, and that’s legislators.

SB 5 has given unions the best argument for spending money on elections that they’ve ever had. If they could have gotten one more Dem senator elected, SB 5 wouldn’t have passed. And with increased PAC donations, they can make sure it never takes effect. People who never believed that labor had a legitimate interest in electoral politics (may) now see how wrong they’ve been. We may be seeing the principle of “that which does not kill us makes us stronger” in action.

As long as we make sure we don’t let it kill us.

 
  • Anonymous

    The GOP may be mean but they ain’t stupid.

  • herc

    It’s so sickening that they’re so good at manipulation. They seem to spend an awful lot of time, money, and energy manipulating and bending the truth, I wonder where they find the time to even do some real work. We can’t give up hope though, we have to show there is real power in numbers. While they may have most of the money and cunning manipulation abilities, we have passion and drive for what we know is right. We cannot underestimate our abilities, because it will become just like last November, when I think the Democratic party just gave up.

  • Jason–why does it seem so few Dems exhibit your pragmatism and wonkiness? These are exactly the kinds of points that need raising NOW when we are fired up. I’ve always thought that liberals/progressives are too circumspect to fight fire with fire. Thanks for spreading the word, and fighting the good fight.

  • Natasha

    Very thoughtful analysis.

    The GOP will have other tricks up their slimy sleeves to defeat any referendum to undo their dirtywork against Ohio’s working middle class. Here’s how:

    The race card will be played by GOP political dealers, i.e., birthers and Obama-haters will be given center stage in the GOP limelight. The GOP will deliver us from Obama along with anything non-Christian white, especially Democrats. Remember JK doesn’t “…need your people”.

    Federal health care will be irrationally demonized and supporters of it will be excoriated by the GOP. The GOP will save us from Obama-care.

    Environmentalism and any “green” initiative will be according to GOP dogma, sinful job-killing. Don’t look at the melted nukes in Japan – Coal is king in the USA.

    Abortion will rise to the forefront with the GOP making any pro-choice thinking tantamount to conspiracy to commit murder.

    Guns and firearm freedoms will be harped upon – the GOP postulates that deadly weapons are necessary to protect us from the mobs and hordes on non-white, non-Christians who in GOP eyes are really evil Democrats.

    The GOP sycophantic press and broadcast media in Ohio will do its damnedest to further the GOP agenda forsaking truth, honesty and ethical journalism by serving up GOP tripe 24-7

    Each of these will be powerful GOP wedges to fracture the opposition to the GOP and its war on Unions and public education in Ohio.

  • Anonymous

    The GOP’s main problem with unions is that the unions give to Democrats. In other news, robbers have a problem with cops because cops stop robberies.

  • delcodem

    I would dispute the validity of a survey result that shows 80% of union workers agreed with the following statement:

    “Workers should have the right to decide whether to join a union. They should never be forced or coerced to join or pay dues to a union as a condition of employment.”

    I believe that the statement was not worded well, or the result is not saying what we presume. Workers are not required/”forced or coerced” into joining a union at a union shop. However, contracts generally contain the provision that non-union employees must pay a like amount of dues to defray the cost of collective bargaining, contract administration, etc. I find it hard to believe that 80 percent of members in ANY union would agree that employees in a union shop can decide not to pay dues or not be a union a member, yet take advantage of all of the rights for which the union members have collectively bargained. The result just does not pass the “credible test.”

  • Anonymous

    “The hens, said Napoleon, should welcome this sacrifice as their own special contribution towards the building of the windmill.”

    – George Orwell: Animal Farm

  • Anonymous

    “The hens, said Napoleon, should welcome this sacrifice as their own special contribution towards the building of the windmill.”

    – George Orwell: Animal Farm

  • Anonymous

    Well, that certainly explains a lot… although, there may be a simpler explanation. By irritating labor and its employees, but allowing their representation to be fully funded, the GOP was managing to make their enemies even stronger. They had to cut the union funding along with the addition to the other changes, or they would be slitting their own throat. I was worried that they would change their minds and add this rider on, which is why I never brought it up before. I didn’t want some GOP operative to read my post and get any ideas.

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:


Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!