The Senate Republicans decided to put a little lipstick on the pig that is SB 5.

This afternoon Senate President Tom Niehaus (R-New Richmond) and Senate Insurance, Labor and Commerce Chair Kevin Bacon (R-Footloose) announced the GOP’s “revisions” to Senate Bill 5.

First, the good news.  The new SB 5 does not eliminate the right of State employees to collectively bargain.

This makes Senate Bill 5 take a radical departure from the bill in Wisconsin on a major issue.

However, the right to collectively bargain at both the State and local level will only be on wages only.  No right to bargain regarding health benefits, leave policies (ironically including the Republican favored “flex time” policies) workplace conditions, or any other benefits.

Furthermore, under the new SB 5, all public employee union members are barred from striking.  Niehaus said that disputes will no longer be resolved by binding arbitration, but they admit they are still trying to figure out how exactly such disputes can be resolved without binding arbitration.  They also haven’t figured out the penalty for public employees who strike illegally.  So it literally could be anything from allowing replacement workers as SB 5 originally provided or docking pay at twice the daily wages as Senator Grendell has suggested.

The press gaggle was called after Niehaus, Bacon, and SB 5’s sponsor Senate Majority Whip Shannon Jones (R-Springboro) met privately to discuss the bill.  For some reason, Jones, though, did not appear or participate in the press gaggle.  Also noticeably absent was any talk of “merit pay.”  I am assuming, but we will have to wait and see the language, that step increases are acceptable terms since they would appear to be a wage issue.

Another note from the press gaggle we received seemed to indicate a comment was made that for non-state public unions the only change would be the bar on the right to strike.  Given that public safety union workers like the police and firefighters already cannot strike under existing law, this seems to affect only teachers.

Bacon and Niehaus were asked, but flatly denied, that these changes were made to win votes within their caucus.  They claimed that they were listening to and responding to the testimony.   Apparently they should use their taxpayer provided health insurance and get their hearing checked…

The Toledo Blade (“Ohio Senate Republicans retreat on collective bargaining”) is reporting that Niehaus specifically said that only State workers would be unable to resolve labor disputes by binding arbitration.

According to the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the bill is being amended to accommodate the wishes of Governor Kasich (Mr. 30% Approval Rating):

Niehaus acknowledged that the changes were to accommodate the wishes of Republican Gov. John Kasich, who has on several occasions declared that any public employee who goes on strike should be fired.

"I think our changes to the bill reflect what he’s said publicly," said Niehaus.

So that would seem to indicate that “hiring replacement workers” (“scabs”) is still going to be the bill’s remedy to any public union worker who strikes.

Bacon also seemed to hold out the possibility of carving out the entire public safety unions entirely from SB 5.

Ohio Democrats, who only learned of the changes via the media, were not impressed, according to the Plain Dealer:

"To me, it seems like window dressing," Senate Minority Leader Capri Cafaro, a Democrat from the Youngstown area, said. "At this point, I’m less than impressed with what’s offered."

Cafaro said Senate Democrats were not involved in negotiations that led to the changes. She said the process should be more transparent and collaborative.

"I have no idea what stakeholders they’ve engaged in this," she said.

We’re awaiting further official reaction from the unions and anyone else on this.  Frankly, I’m not entirely sure if these changes are going to win them the votes they need.

Tagged with:
  • Btrains

    “Given that public safety union workers like the police and firefighters already cannot strike under existing law, this seems to affect only teachers.”

    This is factually wrong. Don’t forget that there are plenty of other departments in the state of Ohio that have unions, including all of Ohio’s public institutes of higher education. Every public college has a union for not just professors, but for the majority of regular staff be it dining hall cooks, building maintenance, vehicle mechanics, janitors, refuse collectors, and bus drivers, to name a few. These people are all about to lose just as much as the teachers, police, and firefighters, especially if they lose the right to strike.

  • ohsuzanna

    Have I lost it or does this change (retaining collective bargaining for wages only) make SB 5 like the current Wisconsin bill?

  • Adrienne


  • Adrienne


  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Senate Bill 5 is dead; long live Senate Bill 5 --

  • Anonymous

    SB 5 2.0 seems to still seems to have a few bugs in it. That is what happens when you privatize the programming to lobbyists.

  • Pingback: Senate Bill 5 is dead; long live Senate Bill 5 | Stop Ohio Senate Bill 5()

  • Lindalou50

    It’s still a pig ( Repub ) with lipstick. This is the Repubs answer to monies that unions give to the Dems. You have underestimated the proud union workers of Ohio, Mr. Kasich, now we will just dip in our pockets to get Dems. elected. You are arrogant and smug, forgot your blue collar roots. I’m sad for you.

  • Lindalou50

    No, this is what happens when decisions are made by people who have never broke a sweat or got their hands dirty to earn a days pay !!!

  • Fotogirlcb2002

    this isnt a step up– they still have a choke hold on collective bargaining
    folks they are forcing down OUR throats to support them
    how about all that out of state money that went to Kasich and Fox news money that went to him
    this has turned into a vindetta against supporting the democratic party now
    I thought this was democracy country

    I am starting my letter writing back up

  • BGSU only this year unionized its faculty. Classified and administrative staff are not union.

  • Fotogirlcb2002

    most of us arent allowed to strike — just shows how much these people really know about the employees of this state
    and just let me tell you I dont think that corrections should be looked at all
    its another place where stress abounds ( like being a cop )
    the judicial system needs changed — the judges have a lot to do with over crowding

  • Anonymous

    My bad. Thanks for the correction!

  • Anonymous

    You know you could never okay that pork…it is unfit for consumption…not with all the right wing contaminants in it.

  • Anonymous

    Dispatch has already reported at least eight GOP Senators are opposed or not committed to voting yes on SB 5. The rest of caucus wanted to get rid of collective bargaining. Today, they gave that up in the hope of winning some of the GOP holdouts over. Remains to be seen. But to say that they can pass whatever they want ignores what happened today.

  • Anonymous

    “Given that public safety union workers like the police and firefighters already cannot strike under existing law, this seems to affect only teachers.”

    Plus, there are thousands of social workers, hearing officers, account clerks, paralegals, meter readers, and customer service reps working for counties and municipalities providing child protective services, child support enforcement, victim assistance, etc., etc., etc. throughout the state. Most are represented by AFSCME, with other unions such as CWU at the table.,

  • Anonymous

    Yep, I screwed up. Again, I’m sorry. I was in a hurry to get the post up.

  • Kathleen1106

    This is a lot like Republicans in the 2008 election thinking that if they had a VP candidate with ovaries, they’d win over the women voters.

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!