John Kasich’s pledge to repeal the income tax, whether he intended it or not, is now the CENTRAL issue in the 2010 elections.  And it may just cost the GOP their shot to recapture the Ohio House of Representatives next year.

Shortly before the Do-Nothing House GOP left town for Christmas, thirty-one House Republicans co-sponsored House Bill 400 which would repeal Ohio’s income tax in ten years.

That’s thirty-three members out of forty-six, and it includes the entire current House GOP leadership.  So not only is this a debate for the gubernatorial race, but the entire legislative race as it appears that the GOP legislative caucuses have nearly uniformly signed onto Kasich’s signature issue.  Not only that, but it’ll be a major issue in the State Treasurer’s race as Treasurer Kevin Boyce’s likely GOP opponent, State Rep. Josh Mandel, has co-sponsored the repeal legislation.

Pretty much the only races next year not facing this issue is the Senate and some congressional races.

This is about as detailed, in fact more so, than the vague income tax repeal John Kasich has been talking about for a year.

Of course, State Represenative John Adams has no plan on how this repeal would be paid except by the “magic revenue fairy”

How would he replace the money the tax generates, which makes up a big part of the state budget?

?When the people we chase out of the state decide to stay, they will create jobs. The tax base will expand. That?s the way it works in every scenario,? said Adams.

Actually, what tends to happen in States with no income taxes is that property, sales, and other taxes are higher.  All a repeal would like do, at best, is shift the tax burden around.

In completely “unrelated news,” the Washington Post reported that latest census survey showed the Florida and Nevada– two States with no income tax and higher unemployment than Ohio had more people move out than in. 

I believe Kasich’s unofficial Virginia-based astroturfing campaign blogger called that voting with their feet.

 
  • oh_dirtgirl

    “When the people we chase out of the state decide to stay, they will create jobs. The tax base will expand. “

    Republicans need to stop home-schooling and start learning math. How will the tax base expand if we aren't gaining population? If you take away 40% of the revenue, even if you keep ALL the people, it still won't make up for the revenue loss, unless you assume state income tax collection forecasts factor in a 40% population loss (hint: they don't).

  • modernesquire

    It's the “Magic Revenue Fairy,” dirgirl, and you don't get it because you don't BELIEVE in fairies…. at least budget fairies.

    What's funny (and tragic) is that this is exact same rationale that was used in 2005 to support those tax cuts even though there was no identified way to pay for them.

    It's one thing to be ignorant of history. It's downright psychotic to forget what happened last week.

  • Adrienne

    Decreasing spending when times are good is fine. People need less help.

    Assuming someone from Strickland's office reads this blog……..how about some nice talking points? Will put on my thinking cap.

  • Adrienne

    Mark Naymik is starting….if you read his editorial yesterday in the PD…..
    He is setting up Strickland on taxes. This is the second reference to a “tax increase”. That I have seen.
    Respond directly to Naymik or to the editorial page??

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:


Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!