If you want to convince a large number of people to vote No on a given ballot issue the standard strategy is to present as many different objections to the issue as possible hoping that at least one of them will resonate with each voter.

And that is exactly what the anti-issue 3 folks have been doing. The polls still bode positively for the casino backers, but the numbers in support of Issue 3 are down slightly over the past few weeks thanks to the constant, diverse, and often contradictory attacks against the casino plan.

So far we’ve heard that Issue 3 is evil because it is a constitutional amendment, because there isn’t enough oversight over the casinos, because the casinos will hire – gasp! – out-of-state workers, because the casinos will somehow put people out of work, because some washed up former OSU football player can’t control his gambling addiction, because gambling destroys families. One anti-Issue 3 ad actually says that casinos cause people to commit suicide and implies that it causes drunk guys to beat up their wives.

Do any of these things sound plausible? Do any of these things make you want to vote against Issue 3 “just in case” it happens to be true? If so, their strategy is working on you.

But, unfortunately for them, this strategy hasn’t been as effective as it was in past years.

All of the above-listed reasons only brought the poll numbers down by about 2 points. And that’s not enough to cause the issue to fail. So the anti-gambling folks have decided to add one more “reason” to vote against issue 3. And this time the attacks are personal.

Forget WHY you should hate Issue 3. The anti-issue 3 campaigners now want you to focus on WHO you should hate. And that person is Dan Gilbert – owner of the Cleveland Cavaliers.

Forget about the families and the suicides and the jobs. We are now talking about that evil businessman Mr. Gilbert. Do you really want to give HIM a casino?

I expected to see this kind of personal attack from Progress Ohio. They’ve shown they’ll do anything to win this battle. But I am kind of surprised to see that polite, rational people like Jeff Hess are writing about Gilbert’s nearly 30 year old, college-era police report.

I really don’t see how that is relevant to the discussion at hand. And it’s kind of sad that it’s come down to this. But there are only a few days left and it looks like we can finally put the casino/gambling issue behind us.

Once that happens, I promise I won’t bring it up again. More than that, after Issue 3 passes and they finally allow table gaming in Ohio, all of you are invited to come play poker with me and Eric at the new casino in downtown Columbus. The first round of drinks is on me.

  • I don’t recommend taking Joe up on this. I don’t gamble, I play poker. 😉

  • Shalom Joseph,

    First, I published Roldo Bartimole’s piece on Dan Gilbert, but I cannot take credit for its writing. I wish that I were half the journalist and able to afflict the comfortable as well as Roldo.

    Second, while it is absolutely true that Dan Gilbert’s name appears nowhere on the 3 November ballot, he and a select cabal of others are seeking election for what will be a Constitutionally enshrined, lifetime monopoly office of Casino Operator In Ohio as clearly as any politician your or I have ever considered.

    That being the case, Gilbert’s life in general, and his record as regards gambling issues in particular, no matter how old, are more than fair game for informed conversation before the election.



    p.s. and polite? ouch.

  • justin micahels
  • justin micahels

    Dan Gilbert said he wasn?t arrested. HE LIED!! He lied to the press to you and everybody. The officer who cuffed Gilbert http://bit.ly/1JLWdJ clearly states the he arrested him and refuted Gilbert?s lies. WE CAN?T TRUST GILBERT OR ANYONE FORM ISSUE 3!! VOTE ISSUE 3 DOWN!!

  • So I guess you won’t be joining us, Justin?

  • Mike DeGrenger

    No, justin won’t be joining you, because he’s one of the anti side’s dispatched minions. They’ve been swarming blogs everywhere…

  • @6: Yeah. For sure a minion. Most likely a staffer at TruthPAC. Looks like “justin” was making the rounds using different names:

    Posted by joshlang58 on October 31, 2009 at 8:18 pm

    http://bit.ly/1JLWdJ If we watch this link we see an officer of the law saying that Dan Gilbert lied about his illegal bookmaking arrest.

    That’s the only mention of that bit.ly URL online. Person covers their tracks well using an IP anonymizer. Two different IPs in comments here in a 15 minute span.

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!