Duncan Hunter is running “issue ads” in NH to introduce himself to the voters there. This is obviously against federal campaign finance laws- and people will complain- but if recent elections are any indication of the consequences- then the complaining will lead nowhere.
We saw this type of crap in Ohio last year with Ken Blackwell and the Common Sense 2006 group who was running ads against Ted Strickland. The Blackwell campaign denied any ties to the group- even though the connections were obvious. For example, William Todd (yes- the dirt bag running for Columbus mayor) was the attorney for Ken Blackwell and for Common Sense 2006.
Blackwell, of course, lost the election. And Hunter will never make it out of the primary… so we at least have that going for us.
On the other hand- we all know that advertising wins elections. And dishonest candidates will continue to pull crap like this until we get this whole campaign funding thing worked out.
I’m not screaming for drastic reform, though it would be nice. I’d just like to see a set of rules that is obvious and easy to understand; rules that don’t lead to legal battles that drag on for years.
More than anything else- I’d like to see some candidates that do their best to follow the rules- instead of these dishonest fucks that are constantly hunting for loopholes and gray areas that they can exploit.
Candidate used PAC funds for N.H. ads
Calif. Republican may be violating laws, analysts say
Duncan Hun- ter’s campaign says the spots were issue ads.
By James W. Pindell, Globe Correspondent | February 27, 2007
MANCHESTER, N.H. — Republican presidential candidate Duncan Hunter, a California congressman, has used his political action committee to run New Hampshire television ads introducing himself to voters — in what some specialists say could be a violation of campaign finance laws.
In the ads, Hunter walks beside a huge wire fence and calls for it to be extended along hundreds of miles of the US border with Mexico. He then asks for viewers to “join with me, Duncan Hunter, at Peace Through Strength. Let’s make sure Homeland Security builds the border fence.”
At the end of the ad, viewers are encouraged to visit the PAC’s website, peacethroughstrengthpac.com. If viewers to go to the site a page appears that reads “please visit Duncan Hunter for President 2008” and providing the link to his homepage, a move that can imply the PAC’s endorsement, another potential law violation. Campaign finance laws limit the use of PACs, which have much higher limits on individual donations than those imposed on presidential campaigns, to no more than $5,000 in spending on any presidential candidacy.
But in New Hampshire alone, Hunter’s Peace Through Strength PAC made two separate ad buys on WMUR-TV in Manchester totaling $17,575. Both purchases were made after Hunter opened his presidential committee, which is supposed to cover the costs of his run for the White House.
“He is in some pretty dangerous [legal] territory,” said Jan Witold Baran , a campaign law attorney who was general counsel to the Republican National Committee and to President George H.W. Bush’s 1988 campaign.
Hunter’s campaign spokesman, Roy Tyler , said the PAC- financed ad is simply an “issue ad” and does not promote his presidential campaign. He said the campaign’s lawyers approved the decision to run the spot.
“We believe they are just issue ads and as such we can run them where we want as often as we want,” said Tyler, noting that Hunter does not identify himself as a presidential candidate.
Among those Tyler said he asked was Michelle Kelley , an election lawyer who serves as the PAC’s treasurer. Kelley declined to comment for this story.
Politicians considering presidential races often have used political action committees to pay for travel to early primary states and build support by contributing money to people running for state or local offices. But once a candidate forms a presidential he or she is required to use campaign-committee accounts for all money spent running for office.
The advantage of PACs is that donors can give up to $5,000 per person a year, as compared with a campaign account where donors are limited to $2,300 per person per election cycle.
“I don’t think [Hunter’s use of both committees] is a loophole — it might be an outright violation,” said Stephen R. Weissman, associate director for policy at the Campaign Finance Institute in Washington.
The Federal Election Commission enforces campaign law violations.
Campaign finance specialists said that if Hunter is allowed to use PAC money for ads promoting himself, then such acts will become routine . “If the FEC doesn’t enforce this and do it in an airtight way, then others will surely exploit it,” said Ray La Raja, a political science professor at University of Massachusetts at Amherst.