So we ended up in a PR cage match on healthcare today, pitting Krazy Kenny Blackwell versus Ted “Turnaround” Strickland. Kenny got a Teducation by doing the look over the shoulder routine. Too bad us big bad bloggers were watching. The old flip flop flipper got busted, to be sure.

What was the answer from the Krazy Kenny Klan? Basically copy Ted BUT (big but) add in a personal mandate. No, I’m sorry, it’s not a mandate (though it would be required) – it’s just a requirement for “personal responsibility”. Implied here is that the 10% of Ohioans uninsured at the moment is due to personal irresponsibility. Right. Krazy Kenny’s plan is basically saying: “Hey, ya’ll get you some insurance…OK? Damn!”

There are almost zero details on how the plan would work. You can read it all (all 9 pages of it) here in pdf.

So this is Krazy Kenny’s answer to the uninsured in Ohio: “Hey,man. I got mine. Now get yours. It’s the law”. I wonder if he’ll couple it with a cute little slogan like “Click it or Ticket”? A $7 billion mandate. Lovely.

The more ominous question is this: In a free market, what incentive would businesses have to keep their plans active if individuals were required to have insurance? I’d like to know details on this. I know the touted Romney plan did not want to include mandatory per person fees for employers of 11 or more, but they apparently have that provision.

The real problem with healthcare in America is cost. We spend damn near double what the rest of the OECD does on average (Weiner).

Republicans are trying to find market fixes for the privilege to have quality healthcare. Progressives view quality healthcare as a fundamental right. Therein lies the difference.

Tagged with:
  • dirtgirl

    Nice catch – hadn’t seen the full document before.

    um, so this section was fascinating…

    Furthermore, this growing consensus involves groups that have not traditionally been involved in the health care debate. For example, in the July, 2006 edition of Christianity Today a Christian perspective on this issue is discussed in a provocative way. Among others, the article quotes Richard Land, the president of the Southern Baptist Convention?s Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission. Rev. Land plainly supports the Massachusetts plan as an innovative attempt to address an important moral and human rights issue. The Rev. Land is quoted as saying: ?With this country?s economic prosperity, we can and should find ways to provide health care for everyone.?

  • Pingback: » Blackwell Outflanks Strickland on Healthcare()

  • BetsyMcCall

    Well if Blackwell and the GOP are such good Christians, and if, as good Christians, they believe we should find ways to provide health care for everyone, why the hell have they spent the last 12 years kicking as many people as possible out of the health care system while cutting taxes for the wealthy?

    Is he lying or just ignorant?

  • Eric

    He’s an ignorant liar.

  • Pingback: » Blackwell vs. Strickland: In Healthcare, a stark contrast…()

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!